ATEG Archives

July 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Veit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:57:20 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (888 bytes) , text/html (1141 bytes)
It is strange that the tradition is to speak of the "present" participle
and the "past" participle when the difference between them has nothing to
do with tense and everything to do with voice.  The so-called present and
past participles are really the active and passive participles
respectively.  As examples:

The "present" (active) participial phrase "the child eating the candy..."
corresponds to the active relative clause "the child that is eating the
candy...."

The "past" (passive) participial phrase "the candy eaten by the child..."
corresponds to the passive relative clause "the candy that is eaten by the
child...."

A change of nomenclature to active participles and passive participles
would clarify these ubiquitous constructions for our students (and
ourselves) since the standard terms are inaccurate and misleading.

Dick Veit
UNCW English Department
http://www.uncwil.edu/people/veit/DEG/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2