I Googled "everyone is not" (in quotes) and got over a million
responses. Just on page 1, there were these:
* Everyone is not a designer.
* Everyone is not doing it. (about abstinence)
* Why everyone is not entitled to an opinion.
* Why everyone is not your prospect.
* "Everyone" is not your target market. (OK, the quotes make
this one different.)
It seems that many people use "not everyone is" and "everyone is not"
synonymously. Or should I say, everyone does not understand "everyone
does not understand" to mean "no one understands."
Dick
________________________________
Richard Veit
Department of English
University of North Carolina Wilmington
-----Original Message-----
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Hancock
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 9:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: a problem in negation
Seth,
I was impressed with Bill's answer also (not the first time and I
hope not the last.) I just wanted to add that I immediately thought of
"All that glitters isn't gold" as following the same pattern. I have
been waiting to post it, hoping another example might come to mind, but
none has. I suspect that's not enough to make it a fixed construction.
But people have found it acceptable enough to repeat it.
Craig
Katz, Seth wrote:
> Thanks, Bill--beautifully articulated, as usual. My friend--a biology
professor--really appreciated your response.
>
> Dr. Seth Katz
> Assistant Professor
> Department of English
> Bradley University
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of
Spruiell, William C
> Sent: Wed 9/10/2008 12:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: a problem in negation
>
>
>
> I suspect that most speakers use a "pragmatic" rather than strictly
> logic-based approach to dealing with negation -- that is, there's an
> immediate jump to "why might someone say this?" that at least
partially
> bypasses "which unit does the negative group with?" That's the only
way
> I can understand why, for example, "I could care less" and "I couldn't
> care less" are interpreted as synonymous by most people.
>
> In this particular case, I'd normally think that a speaker saying "All
> people are not Republicans" might be doing so for one of three
reasons:
>
> (1) S/he wants me to interpret it differently from "No-one is a
> Republican," since that's a lot easier if it's what you mean. (This
> gives your (and my) initial reading)
>
> (2) S/he's having one of those not-infrequent slips of the tongue in
> which the negative you meant didn't parachute in when you wanted it
to.
>
>
> (3) S/he had a logic class at some point, and is channeling something
> like "For all X such that X are members of the set 'people', X is a
> member of the set 'non-Republican'."
>
>
> I'd probably adjust my guesses based on what I knew of the speaker. If
> s/he has a tendency to fixate on the Liar's Paradox and what it means
> for reality, I'd pick #3, especially if s/he occasionally mutters
> something about early Wittgenstein being *so* much better than later
> Wittgenstein.
>
>
> Bill Spruiell
> Dept. of English
> Central Michigan University
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Katz, Seth
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: a problem in negation
>
> A friend sent me the following example of a 'pet peeve':
>
> "All people are not Republicans" used to mean that
there
> are no Republicans,
> period. When I hear this now, though, after a brief
> celebration, I realize
> that the speaker meant "not all people are
Republicans".
> Sad, but true to
> the times.
>
> It took me awhile to hear his preferred interpretation of the
sentence.
> Why do we jump the negation from "Republicans" to "all"? That is, we
> seem to be doing something like taking an existential statement like
>
> There are no people who are Republicans.
> There are not people who are Republicans.
>
> And turning it into
>
> There are people who are not Republicans.
>
> Why?
>
> Dr. Seth Katz
> Assistant Professor
> Department of English
> Bradley University
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
> interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
