ATEG Archives

June 2010

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Spruiell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:54:32 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1364 bytes) , text/html (1698 bytes)



As with the draft version that was discussed a while back, the Standards are
still confusing ³what students do² and ³what they can talk about,² although
this may be strategic. ³Using simple tenses² is slated for 3rd grade, for
example, but native-English-speaking students will have been using simple
tenses since kindergarten at least. Knowledge about tenses would logically
go in ³knowledge of language,² but the Standards seem the reserve the latter
term more for stylistics.

This kind of confusion could allow school systems to imply they¹re ³teaching
about² tenses, while only having to demonstrate that yes, their students use
the kind of English pre-schoolers are capable of.  There¹s no requirement
that the students identify a verb form as present, merely that they use some
simple present verbs (note that I¹m not saying that the students should or
should not be able to label verb tenses, only that as worded, the standards
don¹t really ask for what one might think they¹re asking for). I suppose
that could be a feature, not a bug. But it would be very hard to defend if
someone questioned them about it directly.

--- Bill Spruiell

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2