ATEG Archives

July 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dick Veit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:48:57 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2048 bytes) , text/html (2293 bytes)
"Rebecca S. Wheeler" wrote:

> The "past participle" occurs as one of the two parts of the
> perfect/completive aspect, here in active voice:
>
> ACTIVE: The child has eaten the cookie.
> Passive: The cookie has been eaten by the child.
>
> Thus, the past participle occurs in active voice and passive voice.

My fault for being confusing about terminology.  When I said that the "past
participle" should be called the "passive participle," I was referring just to
"past" participles that modify nouns (in participial phrases), not to the
entire class of inflected verbs that end in -ed (for regular verbs) and -en
(for most irregular verbs).  Verb forms in this class have several functions:
they can follow forms of the perfect have (She has/had eaten) and they can
follow forms of the passive be (The cookie is/was/has been/had been eaten).
My claim is that so-called "past" participles that modify nouns belong to the
later category and, consequently, "passive participle" is an appropriate
designation for them.

Johanna Rubba rightly points out that some noun-modifying "past participles"
are not passive: the fallen tree, the retired teacher, the expired
subscription.  These are relatively infrequent; I'd speculate that in any
random corpus, 95% of the noun-modifying "past" participles would be passive.
Although not grammatically passive, semantically they describe an act that has
happened to the noun, not something the noun does. It is significant that they
can be preceded by be as well as have (The tree is fallen, The teacher is
retired, The subscription is expired), and I'd contend that these are the
source of the noun-modifiers, not the perfect forms (The tree has fallen,
etc.).  Syntax is rule-governed and loves generalizations, and there are no
generalizations involving a connection between the perfect and the
noun-modifying "past" participle.  Very few perfects could be said to have
corresponding noun-modifying past participles.  For example, "the forgotten
man" always relates to "the man who is forgotten," never to "the man who has
forgotten."

Dick Veit


ATOM RSS1 RSS2