ATEG Archives

October 2007

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ronald Sheen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:19:26 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Bruce raises an interesting issue which all teachers have to confront from 
time to time.   That is the implementation of an innovation which they are 
not necessarily equipped to handle and which they find implicitly entails 
their rejecting their own teaching prinicples.  This happened in ESL in 
Quebec and Bangalore, India in the 80s where teachers were forbidden to 
teach grammar when an extreme form of communicative language teaching was 
introduced which, by the way, ultimately failed.

I wonder whether any members have had experience of this in teaching English 
as a first language.

Interestingly, in the cases mentioned in the first pargraph, as teachers 
increasingly lost faith in the innovation, they returned surreptitiously to 
their own teaching principles.

Ron Sheen 

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2