ATEG Archives

December 2010

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eduard Hanganu <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:49:52 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2684 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Brad,

I know what the past perfect is, and I understand its value on the time axis. I use it in a couple of languages. I can also define it, but what difference would it make to you? You are not a believer.
I am not peevish. I am just tired of your endless repetitions of the same ignorant affirmations on the tenses in English. You need to do a little reading before you can make some relevant conversation. Quirk and Comrie's books are not diversions from the topic. They contain information that might improve your understanding of the English tenses. 

Happy Holidays!

Eduard 

----- Original Message -----
From: Brad Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010 20:29
Subject: Re: Despain, Mastering the Challenge
To: [log in to unmask]

> Eduard is peevish because I asked him, after a number of 
> pleasant and 
> interesting exchanges, to define the past perfect. He can't do 
> it. He doesn't 
> know what it is. That makes him cross. (If you can do 
> it, Eduard, do it. Don't 
> rant at me. Just do it.)
>  
> I then asked him to ask each person in one of his classes to 
> send me a 
> definition, without him explaining what it is. I don't want to 
> read 30 
> variations on what he tells them. Make it open book. Let them 
> look it up if they 
> want.
>  
> He won't do that either, so he sends out a spleen-gram, and he 
> drops Quirk's 
> name as a smoke screen but Quirk won't help him. How's that for 
> a definitive 
> statement? Quirk won't help.
>  
> Please prove me wrong, Eduard. Maybe the others will help you. 
> Who has Quirk 
> handy?
>  
> .brad.23dec10.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Eduard Hanganu <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 7:41:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Bruce Despain, Mastering the Challenge
> 
> 
> Brad,
> 
> This is my example:
> 
> "I HAD BEEN READING [ Past Perfect Tense Progressive Aspect] 
> your rumblings for 
> too long before I DECIDED  [ Absolute Simple Past Tense ] 
> that they were not 
> worth my time."
> 
> This is a proper use of the Progressive Past Perfect Tense 
> (Aspect) and of the 
> (Absolute) Simple Past Tense on the time axis. See Quirk et al. 
> in "A 
> Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language," and Comrie in 
> "Aspect."  
> 
> 
> 
> Eduard 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web 
> interface at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
> 
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2