ATEG Archives

October 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
H Thomas McCracken <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 1997 15:52:20 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (7 lines)
Hi, Brenda.  I think of the reflexive in objective position as a
hypercorrection (the two "rules" here would be that the reflexive should
be identical with the doer of the action and it isn't in your example.
And objective case "rules" as object here).  But I personally find
"incorrect" to be too loaded a word to refer to the common usage you
cited.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2