Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:53:54 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Craig,
There is no reason for Phil Bralich or anyone else to impede progress
on the scope-and-sequence project. Also, one should reach a limit
regarding how much energy one expends on responding to criticisms from
someone who seems impervious to valid counterarguments. It's often hard
not to respond, but it gets to be a waste of time when one's defenses
are ignored, summarily dismissed, or criticized illogically.
Two strategies: (i) resist the urge to respond yet again with a
lengthy, decently argued response; (ii) hit the delete button. Everyone
on this list has that choice with regard to every message (including
mine). If your project got strong support at the ATEG meeting, there is
no reason to believe that won't continue. If someone wishes to create a
competing or separate project, let them, and let them look for support.
Dr. Johanna Rubba, Associate Professor, Linguistics
Linguistics Minor Advisor
English Department
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Tel.: 805.756.2184
Dept. Ofc. Tel.: 805.756.2596
Dept. Fax: 805.756.6374
URL: http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|