ADHS Archives

December 2010

ADHS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Alcohol and Drugs History Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:47:48 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3408 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Dear David and ADHS Listserv:
    Thanks for your post.
    I am working on alcohol policy and regulation under the  Vichy 
collaborationist regime and find much material on extra wine rations for  workers 
doing hard manual labor and at the same time increasing restrictions  placed 
on the sale of aperitifs and the sale of alcohol in cafes.
    Thanks, all the best, Scott
 
 
In Forces of Habit I described the provision of extra alcohol rations for  
German troops and their adjuncts involved in both regular military and 
"special"  actions, such as participation in mass executions (pp. 143-144). I 
have since  come across several references to similar uses of alcohol in the 
Holocaust  literature, e.g., in Christopher Browning's Ordinary Men. I do not 
recall,  however, any cases of the Germans distributing alcohol in amounts 
or  circumstances that would be likely to foment rebellion. I would also 
stress,  with Frederick Smith, that the use of alcohol as an incentive for work  
(particularly for difficult, unpleasant, and/or morally compromised work) 
has a  long and extensive history. Comparatively speaking, I don't see 
anything unusual  in the Germans' "incentivizing" behavior.

David T.  Courtwright
Presidential Professor
Department of History
University of  North Florida
1 UNF Drive, Jacksonville, FL 32224-2645 USA

email:  [log in to unmask]; office phone: 904 620-1872;
office fax 904 620-1018; home  phone 904 745-0530
________________________________________
From: Alcohol  and Drugs History Society [[log in to unmask]] On 
Behalf Of Frederick H.  Smith [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:35 AM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Nazi alcohol policies in occupied  Europe

In my book Caribbean Rum: A Social and Economic History I explore  this 
issue in
a different context. White sugar planters doled out huge  amounts of rum to
enslaved workers on their estates, but they were ambivalent  about the 
practice.
On the one hand planters used rum as a reward for good  work and as a work
incentive. It was also given out during holidays, such as  Christmas and 
cropover.
However, slave revolts and rebellions were frequent  during these holiday
celebrations. Moreover, the planters wanted a productive  workforce and 
turned
a blind eye to drinking and drunkenness as long as it  did not interfere 
with
productive labor (the source of the planters' power).  In short, planter 
discussions
of drinking by their enslaved workers reveal a  strong ambivalence. Rum was 
a
tool of domination, but it was also a key  instrument in fomenting 
rebellion.


------
Frederick H.  Smith
Associate Professor
College of William and Mary
Department of  Anthropology
Washington Hall
PO Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA    23187

Email: [log in to unmask]
Phone: 757-221-1063

---- Original  message ----
>Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:36:43 -0500
>From: David  Fahey <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Nazi alcohol policies in  occupied Europe
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>I recall at a  conference hearing a Polish scholar say that his father,
>a railroad  worker during the Nazi occupation, received vodka for good
>work.   Providing alcohol to occupied populations had many
>complications.   Did drunkenness encourage rebellion or acquiescence?
>As in the example  cited, could it be used to enforce good behavior?
>Did Nazi policy vary  from country to country?
>
>--
>David M.  Fahey
>Professor Emeritus of History
>Miami  University
>Oxford, Ohio 45056
>USA=


ATOM RSS1 RSS2