Dear Michael & John,
This marginalisation of 'addiction studies' also impacts on the medical and
related 'caring professions' with GP's in the UK who work with drug and
alcohol users frequently incurring the unwarranted disciplinary attentions of the
General Medical Council, the odium of their peer's and fellow professionals.
Sadly the marginalisation of drug and alcohol users is reflected in the
marginalisation of those who work with them and- script- them.
In the early 2000's for an all too fleeting, brief and heady period that saw
the creation of the National Treatment Agency, the recognition of 'service
user', drug user advocacy and other user/carer groups, it appeared that health
and harm reduction would finally be brought in from the cold and form the
axis around which UK Gov drug and alcohol policy (albeit the alcohol policy was
very much an after thought- tacked on late in the day) - would turn.
Groups such as the 'Substance Misuse Management in General Practice' working
party started to train, support and create an ethos where drug and alcohol
treatment formed part of general practice and 'normal' health care. One could-
ideally- get ones methadone script from your family GP at the same time as
getting treatment for other health problems. It looked like users, carer's, &
drug and alcohol treatment would finally be released from the ghetto's to
which they (post Brain 2) had been consigned.
Sadly & in my view tragically this proved to be a false dawn as drug and
alcohol policy became increasingly subordinated to the criminal justice/social
'engineering' agenda's of the day as compassion fatigue set in and politicians
and rather un-civil servants found- to their surprise- that methadone was no
panacea for grinding poverty, economic and educational marginalisation,
teenage pregnancy, rising levels of poly drug(notably crack, cocaine ) and
alcohol use, homelessness & the blight of post Friedmanite economic theology that
persists to this day.
The multitude were becoming increasingly intoxicated and the spectre of the
horde becoming truly revolting- as well as increasingly 'repugnant'- stalked
the ruling caste & all who suckled at the manifold teats of the global
leviathan.
Anxiety's about the 'emergent' under class, the benefit prole's, became
increasingly evident and political, media, social and other commentary from the
ruling caste betrayed not only anxieties but a deep loathing- disgust- hatred-
for this 'newly discovered' urban poor.(The rural poor were 'discovered' a
little later).
The media simulacrum created a land where crime and criminality was
everywhere- no street-no home- no car- no property- no person- was safe from the
avarice of the non working poor.
Further- the children of this new 'caste' of 'ZEK's were a demon brood-
muggers, violent, illiterate, druggies, hoodies, knife wielding,
'shameless',(currently one of the best UK TV drama's- and one that re-humanises those who
have been de-humanised)- they epitomised everything that caused the middle
classes and all 'decent' people fear, anxiety, loathing & distress. Sadly it seems
that Marcuse's maxim - that crime was a form of resistance to colonisation
by Capital- albeit one without 'class consciousness'- was forgotten.
What's more in a society where conspicuous consumption (Thorstien Veblan?)
reigned supreme & celebrity 'culture' was the great levelleras well as the
lifestyle to which we all should aspire, the 'new' poor wanted it all and wanted
it now! Deferred gratification- simply not possible on a minimum
income-could be dispensed with- 'take what you want-take what you need- & wait for no
one' . Need a flash car- why not take one- no need for keys-just a sprung
centre punch and that BMW is yours for the taking.
In response to these anxieties a whole raft of legislation was enacted
against the new 'enemy within'. The Prime Ministers son found drunk, disheveled &
disorderly in Trafalgar Square makes headline news but gets a police car
'taxi ride' home. A child born of lower parentage could expect no such tender
mercy- instead the evil spawn of the new poor could expect a drug test, an 'Anti
Social Behaviour Order', Drug Treatment & Testing orders, and the full
majesty of the law to be applied to every minutiae of their waking, sleeping,
lives.
The children of the Elite- the likes of David Cameron, Oliver Letwin, et-al-
could run amok in Oxbridge restaurants- buying the acquiescence and
complicity of the restaurant owners, abused minimum waged staff- etc- with -
literally- showers of cash as they quaffed champagne, took cocaine, and prepared for
a life in politics and power.(Allegedly of course).
Such behaviour on the part of the ruling elite, of the celebrity culture,
was hi-jinks and jolly japes- good for a media story or three but no cause for
hand wringing, existential angst, or legislative might.
But as for the children of those living in 'social housing', those whose
parents, parents were the unemployed of Thatchers brave new Britain, whose
parents were the children of that generation of the dispossessed, this was a cause
for crimminalisation and concern. So we have seen over the past decade the
'crimminalisation' of childhood, childhood is a problem to be controlled,
cajoled, managed, teenagers a threat to be monitored, contained and constrained,
clinically and socially pathologised.
Surplus to the requirements of Globalisation and transnational Capital these
children of the poor are unwanted- of no value and therefore deemed to be
valueless- to have no values- amoral- these kids were 'feral' and merited
treating as such. This much the media pundits, the academic's and their political
masters could agree upon- what small comforts the new lumpen prole's could
enjoy- cheap booze- fags-heroin-cheap cocaine-cannabis- was something 'they' (
do I mean the ruling caste or the prole poor?) could not afford nor allow.
So we have seen the revival of the same old litany & demonology of old- the
'Crack Epidemic', the 'Junky Scum', 'The Brew Crew', all are redolent of the
'whorey' old mythology of past times- when demon Gin was 'Mothers Ruin' and
opium just a habit- but one that the ruling caste with their ether kits,
silver syringes and morphine, afternoon teas for the 'lady's who lunch', could be
indulged in but one that spelt peril & ruination for the Victorian poor.
Berridge and Edwards study of opium use in 19th century England is illuminating-
the intrepid investigative reporters who ventured into the 'fenlands' of East
Anglia, the public houses of the East End of London where the cheapest beer
was one potentiated with opium, have an uncanny resemblance to the reportage
of the 'dirty' habits and 'vices' of the modern day poor.
Well- that's gone somewhat off topic and I've - in the words of Nietzsche :
"Forgotten my umbrella"- that is the thrust of what I intended to convey- so
I'll call it a day- and sign off by sounding my alarm at the folly of the new
Scottish Governments policy of Alcohol related Harm Reduction by pricing.
Why my alarm- the idea- as I understand it- is to link the price of alcohol
directly to it's 'strength' per UK measure. SO a 500 ml can of 'Carlsberg
Special Brew' (despite it's association with the poor it is rumoured to have
been made for Churchill & was a favoured 'tipple' of this well known boozer)-
which contains 4.5 UK units of alcohol will attract a higher 'levy' than a 500
ml can of "Carlsberg Lager" which has about 2 UK units per can.
The theory being that this will compel the urban and rural poor who favour
strong alcohol and are therefore at greater risk of alcohol related harm to
modify there alcohol use and induce them to drink weaker & cheaper booze &
brands.
Sadly- I fear that such measures will see those most at risk and those
already alcohol dependent re-prioritise their budgets- with their favourite tipple
coming ahead of such trivial needs such as food, heating, rent, energy
bills, clothing, health, etc.
As for the 'binge drinking masses' - if they can afford to drink 'out on the
town & tiles' then they will continue to be able to do so- de-facto- they
are not the lumpen prole- but those who are relatively privelaged to be in
waged or even well paid- employment- either that or they are pretty good at crime
with the attendant risks 'coming with the job's".
I'm not aware of any evidence base that suggests pricing per unit will
reduce alcohol related harm- indeed I suspect it may serve to aggravate it as the
cost of booze prohibits expenditure on a decent diet and other things that in
themselves serve to reduce the harm of alcohol and/or other drug use.
Best wishes: Alan Joyce.
Michael,
I concur with the wisdom already expressed on this point. What you are
missing is this: Alcohol and Addiction Studies does NOT share the respectability
of what might be called Diversity Studies, the political correctness of which
more or less guarantees space at professional conferences and in hiring
pools. Nor does our field qualify as “Identity Scholarship,” another approved
approach. During the heyday of DIONYSOS, the MLA consistently rejected any
and all proposed panels in A&AS; perhaps it still does. Certainly I would not
advise a new PhD in English to come out nakedly and solely in our field. It
’s prudent to regard doing A&AS – at least in an English department -- as a
post-tenure luxury. The reasons for this situation are well worth
considering, but they are, unfortunately, among those things in academe (and elsewhere)
currently filed under “mum’s the word”: not to be spoken of out loud in
public, candor being potentially hazardous to one’s professional health. For
the sake of younger scholars and of our field, I sincerely hope I’ve gone a
little paranoid in these remarks, that I’ve bleakly overstated the case. I
welcome contrary testimony.
John W. Crowley
____________________________________
From: Alcohol and Drugs History Society [mailto:[log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) ] On Behalf Of Michael Carolan
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask])
Subject: Re: literary drinking
As a new member of the forum (and, believe it or not, a former student of
Professor Wedge’s), I appreciate all the recommendations of creative work in
here. I wanted to share what a veteran professor had to say about the field in
a professional recommendation he wrote for me recently after I developed
addiction studies courses at UMass:
“Addiction is an area of study not unlike African American studies or Native
American studies, and possibly all the more relevant not least because it
not yet an established area of study.”
As I enter the severely shrunken academic job market, I am left wondering
why all I see are openings for minority, third world, gay and lesbian studies
but none for alcohol, mental illness, and/or addiction? Am I missing
something?
With deep respect,
Michael Carolan
|
