ATEG Archives

October 1997

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jean Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:50:36 -0700
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
A colleague asked me about the difference between the use of "went" in:
 
        I went home.
           and
        I went shopping.
 
I replied that the second "went" was obviously a kind of auxiliary.  When
I looked this up, the only info I could find in my shelf of books was
from good ol' Quirk & Randolph, who call "start," "go on," and "get"
catenatives live aspectual and modal auxiliaries.  This makes sense, but
does it include this use of "went"?  And is there any other name for this
phenomenon?  Appreciate any responses I get!
 
Thanks,
 
Jeanie Murphy
Pierce College--Puyallup

ATOM RSS1 RSS2