Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:02:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Herb,
Oddly enough, I found this on a site about grooming Maltese
dogs<http://spoiledmaltese.com/forum/51-maltese-grooming/70607-grooming-ahem-male-pee-pee.html>:
"Then take his two front paws in one hand. Raise your hand carefully until
his underside is "get-at-able" then very carefully perform thatever i[t] is
you intend to do."
Dick
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:41 PM, STAHLKE, HERBERT F <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Craig,
>
> The pattern you illustrate below is certainly true of Standard English.
> However, in colloquial speech and in non-ztandard varieties of English
> "that" is dropped regularly before 0 subjects in relatives. I hear people
> say things like "Anyone/thing touches you touches me" fairly regularly.
> This syntactic change is taking place because that's outside the relative
> clause, just as it's outside the content clause. If it were a pronoun and
> perceived as a pronoun cognitively, then I would also expect to hear
> things like "Thatever gambles loses" along with "Whoever gambles loses."
> But that's one I don't hear. The fact that "that" doesn't delete before a
> 0 subject relative clause in Formal Standard English reflects the
> conservatism of that dialect.
>
> Herb
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|