ATEG Archives

February 2009

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Paul E. Doniger" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:17:15 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3102 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Quirk, et al, (_A Grammar of Contemporary English_. London: Longman, 1972: 76-77), call the subjunctive using "if" the "were-subjunctive" (which is a conditional form, too, I guess -- at least, I seem to remember learning it as the "conditional tense" -- of course, it really isn't a tense at all), saying it is "hypothetical in meaning." I'm not sure what makes it hypothetical at all; it seems quite real to me. They also say that it is restricted to one form ("were" of course) and is only used in the first & third person (singular past forms), as in "If Ed were here, we could discuss the subjunctive mood." 
 
Generally, they also suggest that the subjunctive isn't an important category in English (at least not any more), whatever that means. What makes a form 'important'? They also identify two other forms of the subjunctive (Mandative & Formulaic), but I am still trying to sort out the differences. 
 
On Ed's other comments, I say, "Heaven forbid" that a teacher should "correct" a student's use of the subjunctive; so few students know to use it any more. I find myself trying to get them to use it! It's such a nicely subtle and rich resource. I mourn its loss.
 
Oh, well, "so be it!"
 
Paul D. 
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction" (_Twelfth Night_ 3.4.127-128). 




________________________________
From: Edward Vavra <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 3:22:46 PM
Subject: Subjunctives - help wanted


In KISS grammar, I have to deal with subjunctives, primarily because some (not all) teachers will mark a sentence such as "If he were here, I'd ask him" as containing a subject/verb agreement error. From my perspective, students do not need to learn the concept before seventh grade. (See KISS Level 2.1.7 at http://home.pct.edu/~evavra/kiss/wb/LPlans/Overview.html#Grade-Level_Table)
     But having introduced subjunctives, I'm not sure of how I want to handle them. The nature of subjunctives becomes very complex. I've seen some grammars that consider "If" causes as subjunctives. How many members of this list would agree?
 
Can I assume that "had" constructions, such as "He we but world enough and time" are also subjunctives.
 
My basic understanding was that subjunctives indicate something contrary to fact, but "if" clauses may or may not be so contrary. As I now see it, the confusion may result from differences in the three basic assumptions about definitions--meaning, form, and function.
 
Comments will be appreciated.
EdTo join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list" 
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2