Since you're still talking about my friend John and his rejected application, may I please ask for clarification? I don't know what you're talking about. Please put some meat on the bones.
   
  .brad.16feb08.

DD Farms <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
   
  Craig Hancock wrote: The point all of us are trying to make (patiently, I think) is that context matters.
   
  "John was angry. His application had been turned down twice in three weeks."
   
  There are very good reasons to mix these structures in a single sentence.
   
  ~~~~~~~~~~~

DD: I think we are dealing with the investigation of a receiver's tentative understanding of the content of the messages before and after the interception of a partial transmission. It is related to the study of redundancy in Communication Theory. It is not a trivial matter.

       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/