ADHS Archives

February 2010

ADHS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"K. Austin Kerr" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alcohol and Drugs History Society <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:46:49 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (996 bytes) , text/html (1383 bytes)
I personally like both Starbucks and Seattle's Best.  I have even had 
the latter at a McDonald's out west somewhere.  The most recent issue of 
/Consumer Reports/ gave Starbucks its highest rating, and Seattle's Best 
somewhere down the list.

David Fahey wrote:
> Starbucks owns Seattle's Best Coffee.  For the consumer, how do they
> differ?  i assume that Seattle's Best Coffee is considered a step down
> from Starbucks in prestige.  Is there a difference in the quality or
> kinds of coffee available? Food?  Ambience?  I now find a Seattle's
> Best Coffee shop in the local supermarket (other stores in the same
> chain often have a Starbucks).  The two major bookstores in the
> area--Barnes & Noble and Borders--have Starbucks and Seattle's Best
> respectively.  We often call coffee a commodity.  I assume that brands
> attempt to prevent commodification.
>
>   

-- 
K. Austin Kerr
6446 Strathaven Court East
Worthington OH 43085
Cell:  614-395-5325
Land: 614-846-8406
PLEASE: No calls after 9 p.m. Eastern time



ATOM RSS1 RSS2