FACULTYTALK Archives

November 2011

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options:

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First
Re: truth is stranger than fiction
Lee Reed
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:53:29 -0500
Re: truth is stranger than fiction
Mark DeAngelis
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:17:36 +0000
Re: truth is stranger than fiction
Lee Reed
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:57:00 -0500
Re: truth is stranger than fiction
James Highsmith
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:49:11 -0800
Re: truth is stranger than fiction
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:18:41 +0000
truth is stranger than fiction
Marsha Hass
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:17:39 -0500
Re: ethics testing
Suzy Rogers
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:14:13 +0000
ethics testing
Szostek, Jana Marie
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:16:52 +0000
Legal Studies Classroom Summary
Mark DeAngelis
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:13:14 +0000
Fw: Announcing the CELS 2011: 6th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Online Proceedings
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:37:48 -0600
Google Scholar citation pages
Orozco, David
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:31:36 +0000
Re: More on Kansas City
Miller, Carol J
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:30:53 -0600
Re: AACSB Standards
Prenkert, Jamie D
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:56:15 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:39:49 -0600
Re: More on Kansas City
Gabel, Joan T.A.
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:15:55 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Lizbeth Ellis
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:13:52 -0700
Re: bar admission retirement
Gershuny, Pam
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:43 -0600
Re: AACSB Standards
Eric D Yordy
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:57:52 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Prenkert, Jamie D
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:33:46 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Prenkert, Jamie D
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:31:31 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:07:53 -0600
Re: bar admission retirement
Bagley, Connie
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:48:20 -0500
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Bagley, Connie
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:32:25 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Bagley, Connie
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:23:54 -0500
More on Kansas City
Ginger, Laura
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:45:51 +0000
Re: AACSB Standards
Megan Mowrey
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:07:42 -0500
Re: AACSB Standards
Prenkert, Jamie D
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:44:25 +0000
AACSB Standards
Peter J Shedd
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:05:06 +0000
Re: bar admission retirement
Lizbeth Ellis
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:39:40 -0700
Re: bar admission retirement
Megan Mowrey
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:29:53 -0500
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
John Allison
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:15:07 -0600
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Rosemary Hartigan
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:05:27 -0500
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Dave Schein
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:57:40 -0500
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
John Allison
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:53:06 -0600
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Richard L. Coffinberger
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:38:32 -0500
Re: Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Sally Gunz
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:16:05 -0500
Agree Re: NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Dave Schein
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:42:17 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Hotchkiss, Carolyn
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:29:58 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Robert Bird
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:38:03 +0000
Re: bar admission retirement
Susan Park
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:35:16 -0700
Re: bar admission retirement
J Barrett
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:06:20 -0500
NYT Article on Law School Curriculum
Alan C. Roline
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:35:00 -0600
Re: bar admission retirement
J Barrett
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:31:37 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Robert Thomas
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:16:53 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Thomas Cavenagh
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:07:03 -0600
Re: bar admission retirement
Daren Bakst
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:01:08 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Rosemary Hartigan
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:54:49 -0500
Re: bar admission retirement
Koehler, Michael
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:49:19 +0000
Re: bar admission retirement
Tonia Hap Murphy
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:47:09 -0500
bar admission retirement
Robert Bird
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:45:13 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:53:49 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:12:02 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:39:54 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:30:34 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:54:16 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:30:35 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:09:23 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:57:30 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:52:54 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:47:17 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:46:25 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:41:11 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:08:17 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:55:18 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:17:47 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Michael O'Hara
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:28:56 -0600
video slideshows
Marsha Hass
Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:00:14 -0500
Re: Please?
Keith A Maxwell
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:28:20 -0800
The phrase "fundamental right" might need some clarification.
Bill Shaw
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:20:48 -0600
Re: Please?
Sally Gunz
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:52:25 -0500
Please?
Steslow, Donna
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:40:46 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
James A. Bryant
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:40:37 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:24:40 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Peter Shears
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:20:50 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:20:31 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:16:00 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Barnes, J.D., Glenn
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:11:02 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:52:00 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:58 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:45:36 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:17:30 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:25:54 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:59:19 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Thomas Cavenagh
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:44:35 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Tonia Hap Murphy
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:36:01 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:36:36 +0000
Copy Machines
Bill Shaw
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:57:02 -0600
Fundamental rights
Bill Shaw
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:50:42 -0600
Obamacare gets 5.5 hours in the USSC
Keith A Maxwell
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:51:06 -0800
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Thomas Cavenagh
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:31:34 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:32:15 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:03:37 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:23:40 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:57:22 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Bagley, Connie
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:49:43 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:42:29 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:41:07 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:30:44 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:11:01 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:27:58 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:07:50 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:51:59 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:05:30 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:01:50 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:53:53 -0500
Electoral College etc.
Kenneth Schneyer
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:43:27 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:41:51 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:25:23 -0600
Re: I hadn't watch C-Span-2 Book TV until a friend called and mentioned UT law/government prof Sanford Levinson was featured.
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:16:31 -0600
Re: I hadn't watch C-Span-2 Book TV until a friend called and mentioned UT law/government prof Sanford Levinson was featured.
Henry Lowenstein
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:49:34 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:34:10 -0500
Re: I hadn't watch C-Span-2 Book TV until a friend called and mentioned UT law/government prof Sanford Levinson was featured.
Michael O'Hara
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:19:38 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Michael O'Hara
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:01:38 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:57:34 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:42:46 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:37:03 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:18:22 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:07:36 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:36:44 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:34:08 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Henry Lowenstein
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:32:56 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:22:34 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
James Highsmith
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:18:19 -0800
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:05:39 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Maurer,Virginia G
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:54:42 +0000
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:44:33 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:38:09 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
John Allison
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:36:39 -0600
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:10:19 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Bagley, Connie
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:33:31 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Lee Reed
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:14:24 -0500
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Daren Bakst
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:58:10 -0400
Re: The need for a limiting principle?
Michael O'Hara
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:27:23 -0600
Re: Twisted Links Readers - Need Feedback
Kenneth H Ginsberg
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:28:33 -0500
classroom debate protocol anyone?
Sleeper, Bradley
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:50:08 +0000
Twisted Links Readers - Need Feedback
Donna Pelham
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:57:22 -0500
The need for a limiting principle?
Terence Lau
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:58:56 -0500
Supreme Court to Hear "Obamacare" Case
Daren Bakst
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:34:20 -0400
I hadn't watch C-Span-2 Book TV until a friend called and mentioned UT law/government prof Sanford Levinson was featured.
Bill Shaw
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:21:09 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Henry Lowenstein
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:34:36 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Michael O'Hara
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:11:13 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Peter Bowal
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:35:51 -0700
Another topic
Maurer,Virginia G
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:49:45 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:32:52 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Michael O'Hara
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:47:39 -0600
Re: If medical care was de-coupled from an employee's package of benefits, part or all of that would go to the employee in the form of salary, but . . .
Maurer,Virginia G
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:43:43 +0000
If medical care was de-coupled from an employee's package of benefits, part or all of that would go to the employee in the form of salary, but . . .
Bill Shaw
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:27:04 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:00:59 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Peter Bowal
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:53:34 -0700
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:43:21 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
John Allison
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:52:30 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Pearson Liddell
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:50:33 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
John Allison
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:27:23 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Henry Lowenstein
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:20:39 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
James Highsmith
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:59:51 -0800
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Lizbeth Ellis
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:29:25 -0700
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Henry Lowenstein
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:58:11 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Michael O'Hara
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:42:13 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:06:25 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Pearson Liddell
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:20:00 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
James Highsmith
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:18:19 -0800
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:08:06 +0000
Liz, your note and others show strong support for continued unemployment insurance in our membership. Thanks.
Bill Shaw
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:18:33 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Lizbeth Ellis
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:57:03 -0700
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:36:02 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:26:00 +0000
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
James A. Bryant
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:05:02 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:22:29 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Pearson Liddell
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:38:18 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Norman W Hawker
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:12:00 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Pearson Liddell
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:47:55 -0600
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Keith A Maxwell
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:46:01 -0800
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Norman Hawker
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:41:08 -0500
Re: "Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Michael O'Hara
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:20:13 -0600
"Unemployment Insurance and Job Search in the Great Recession"
Michael O'Hara
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:53:43 -0600
Legal Studies Classroom Blog summary
Mark DeAngelis
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:38:15 +0000
Re: Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Discussion on Fiction Blog
Kenneth Schneyer
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:43:20 -0500
<No subject>
Stephen McKelvey
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 18:23:21 -0500
<No subject>
Anne Keaty
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 12:23:44 -0800
Re: Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Discussion on Fiction Blog
J Barrett
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:56:52 -0500
Re: Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Discussion on Fiction Blog
Petty, Ross
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:24:30 -0500
Discrimination & Sexual Harassment Discussion on Fiction Blog
Kenneth Schneyer
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 11:43:17 -0500
Re: publication - Congrats!
Emerson,Robert W
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 01:46:21 +0000
Re: publication - Congrats!
Peirce, Ellen
Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:38 -0400
position announcement
Robert Bird
Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:33:23 +0000
"Tracking Health Insurance Coverage by Month: Trends in Employment-Based Coverage Among Workers, and Access to Coverage Among Uninsured Workers, 1995-2010"
Michael O'Hara
Fri, 4 Nov 2011 07:44:00 -0500
How little do you know Peter.
Bill Shaw
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:29:28 -0500
Affordable Health Care Act
Bill Shaw
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:56:40 -0500
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 21:32:47 +0000
Re: Confidentiality agreements - Good Old Grover
Emerson,Robert W
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:37:00 +0000
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Rosemary Hartigan
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:34:14 -0400
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Henry Lowenstein
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:16:45 -0400
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Suzy Rogers
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:55:44 +0000
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Pearson Liddell
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:37:10 -0500
Re: Confidentiality agreements
Maurer,Virginia G
Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:41:21 +0000
Confidentiality agreements
James Highsmith
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:46:34 -0700
Re: It is official!
Lee Reed
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:06:45 -0400
Re: It is official!
Michael O'Hara
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:40:32 -0500
Re: It is official!
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 22:28:41 +0000
Re: It is official!
Rollie Cole
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:12:45 -0500
Re: correction- Congrats!
Peirce, Ellen
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:09:30 -0400
Re: It is official!
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:03:50 -0400
Re: It is official!
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:54:05 +0000
Re: It is official!
Richard Hurley
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:42:03 +0000
Re: It is official!
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:35:13 -0400
Re: It is official!
Rollie Cole
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:29:24 -0500
Re: It is official!
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:59:37 -0400
on the good news front
Sally Gunz
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:54:27 -0400
Re: publication - Congrats!
Emerson,Robert W
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:41:35 +0000
correction- Congrats!
Marsha Hass
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:27:06 -0400
publication - Congrats!
Marsha Hass
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:21:46 -0400
Re: It is official!
Maurer,Virginia G
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:12:56 +0000
Re: It is official!
Henry Lowenstein
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:59:20 -0400
Re: It is official!
James Highsmith
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:04:48 -0700
Re: It is official!
Lee Reed
Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:05:27 -0400
Re: It is official!
Kathleen Lacey
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:45:12 -0700

ATOM RSS1 RSS2