ATEG Archives

March 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options:

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:55:27 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:32 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:55:17 -0500
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:33:30 -0400
Re: due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:23:20 -0400
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:57:36 -0400
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:24:13 -0400
Re: due to
Edmond Wright
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +0000
Re: ATEG Digest - 24 Mar 2008 to 25 Mar 2008 (#2008-76)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:25:53 -0400
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:03:02 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:52:02 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:41:09 -0500
Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:08:03 -0400
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Kathleen M. Ward
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:58:03 -0700
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:52:16 -0400
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Edmond Wright
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:47:16 +0000
interpretation of a relative clause
R. Michael Medley (GLS)
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:37:45 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 21 Mar 2008 to 22 Mar 2008 (#2008-73)
Scott
Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:42:30 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:43:52 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:13 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:50 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:35:41 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:37:44 -0500
Jane Mairs - out of the office
Jane Mairs
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:30:42 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:05:27 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:48:46 -0500
Once and Future English Tense
DD Farms
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:49:43 -0500
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:15:34 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:54:39 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Carol Morrison
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:05:32 -0700
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Geoffrey Layton
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:34:18 -0500
Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:31:13 -0400
FW: Subjunctive(?): not critical that
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:24:38 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:24:12 -0400
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
DD Farms
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:37:28 -0500
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Karl Hagen
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:00 -0700
Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:59:01 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:46:55 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:30 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:40:28 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:34:13 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Bruce Despain
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:11:33 -0600
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:03:24 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Craig Hancock
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:26:28 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:43:42 -0400
For fellow sentence diagrammers
Michael Kischner
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:56:38 -0700
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:22:06 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:35:02 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:12:41 -0400
gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:44:21 -0400
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:08:28 -0400
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Spruiell, William C
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:49:42 -0400
Herb's preference for context
Brad Johnston
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:56:54 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:19:12 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:58:53 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 14 Mar 2008 to 15 Mar 2008 (#2008-66)
Scott
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:25:53 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:07 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:31:48 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Susan van Druten
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:53:18 -0500
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:07:11 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:57:25 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:44:56 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:14:06 -0700
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
DD Farms
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0500
Felicity has been earning lots
Brad Johnston
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:10:36 -0700
Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Scott
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:38:11 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:17:55 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 11 Mar 2008 to 12 Mar 2008 (#2008-63)
Scott
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:53:03 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Wollin, Edith
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:24:49 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:22:30 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:25:17 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Linda Di Desidero
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:36:08 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:06:25 -0500
Re: a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:25:34 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Patrice D. Williams, Ph.D
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:48 -0500
Re: a punctuation question
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:09:12 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Kathleen M. Ward
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:47:19 -0700
Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:55 -0500
Re: a punctuation question
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:14:27 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Nancy Tuten
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:36:45 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Geoffrey Layton
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:59:43 -0500
a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:48:02 -0400
Re: Redundancy
Edmond Wright
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:56:53 +0000
Expletives redundancy
DD Farms
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:02:34 -0500
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:38:19 -0400
Re: "She about to turn..."
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:31:33 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:03 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:06:16 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:02:12 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:54:24 -0400
Re: "She about to turn..."
Don Stewart
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:28:23 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:26:25 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:15:34 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:11:32 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:01:46 -0400
Re: Expletives
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:01:02 -0400
Re: Expletives
Craig Hancock
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:07:30 -0400
"She about to turn..."
Roberto Perez
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:21 -0500
Re: Expletives
Robert Troyer
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:56:05 -0700
Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:09:47 -0400
Passive
Linda Comerford
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:51:31 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:39:58 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:17:21 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:48:49 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:31:32 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:47:14 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Carol Morrison
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:19:01 -0700
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:16:33 -0400
That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:42:14 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:38:41 -0400
Composition Conference in Greeley, Colorado
Ben Varner
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:19:52 -0700
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:42:41 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Nancy Tuten
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:20:16 -0500
Defining passive voice
Kimberley Hunt
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:43:10 -0600
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:38:50 EST
Re: past perfect--a final note
Karl Hagen
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:42:09 -0800
Re: past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:33:19 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:35:22 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Peter Adams
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:15:48 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:04:01 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:05:28 EST
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:06:32 -0500
Re: Problems with communication
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:56:50 -0500
Problems with communication
Bruce D. Despain
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:36:30 -0700
Re: past perfect--a final note
helene hoover
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:45:48 +0000
Civility
Paul E. Doniger
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:41:01 -0800
Re: past perfect--a final note
Brad Johnston
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:17:14 -0800
past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:07:57 -0500
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
rbetting
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:35:21 -0600
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:38:22 -0500
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:07:54 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 29 Feb 2008 to 1 Mar 2008 (#2008-54)
Scott
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:51:03 -0500
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Gretchen Le
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:33:32 -0800
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Phil Bralich
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:17:59 -1000
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
DD Farms
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:36:20 -0600
Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Brad Johnston
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:16:20 -0800
Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama
Carole Hurlbut
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:56:17 -0600
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation
Craig Hancock
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:12:04 -0500

ATOM RSS1 RSS2